Evaluation & the Health Professions

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donabedian, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donabedian, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 8, No. 3, 243-265 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878500800301

Twenty Years of Research on the Quality of Medical Care

1964-1984

Avedis Donabedian

School of Public Health, University of Michigan

Since 1964 we have built on earlier work, with some refinements, particularly in the formulation of explicit criteria of process and outcome; the detailed standardization of case mix when outcomes signify quality; the prespecification of outcomes for follow-up, when adverse outcomes are only the occasion for later assessment of process; a greater emphasis on more subtle organizational characteristics in the study of structure; and the identification of the separate effects of structural attributes by multivariate analysis. We have also paid more systematic attention to questions of measurement, including the veracity and completeness of the record; the procedures of criteria formulation; and the reliability, validity, and screening efficiency of the criteria. A notable advance is the use of decision analysis to identify optimal strategies of care, including the introduction of patient preferences and monetary cost in the specification of such strategies, and the use of decisional algorithms to portray the criteria of quality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. V. Maier
What the surgeon of tomorrow needs to know about evidence-based surgery.
Arch Surg, March 1, 2006; 141(3): 317 - 323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
L. V. Doering, A. W. McGuire, and D. Rourke
Recovering From Cardiac Surgery: What Patients Want You To Know
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2002; 11(4): 333 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
J. T. Ziegenfuss JR
Organizational Barriers to Quality Improvement in Medical and Health Care Organizations
American Journal of Medical Quality, December 1, 1991; 6(4): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]