Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tugwell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tugwell, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Impact of CME

A Methodological Review of the Continuing Medical Education Literature

Dave Davis

R. Brian Haynes

Larry Chambers

Victor R. Neufield

Ann McKibbon

Peter Tugwell

Faculty of the Health Sciences, McMaster University

A review of the literature evaluating the effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education (CME) was undertaken using articles from 1935 to 1982.238 studies were reviewed and annotated using previously established and tested assessment criteria. These criteria included the following areas: the study design; the educational or administrative intervention; the evaluation maneuver used to assess the intervention's outcome; the health professionals used as subjects; andfinally, the educational and statistical significance of the study. It would appear that CMEinterventions when broadly defied, have an impact on physician competence and (less consistently though still in a positive direction) on physician performance and patient outcomes. Further research in both the methods and evaluation of CME is necessary.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 7, No. 3, 251-283 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878400700301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
K. D. Evans and L. Sachs
Effectiveness of a Sonography Distance-Learning Event for Continuing Medical Education Credit
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 2000; 16(4): 148 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
I. Amirav and F. Burg
The Need to Educate Health Professionals About Childhood Asthma
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1994; 148(12): 1339 - 1343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. A. Headrick, T. Speroff, H. I. Pelecanos, and R. D. Cebul
Efforts to Improve Compliance With the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1992; 152(12): 2490 - 2496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
M. A. Friedman and Z. E. Farag
Gaps in the Dissemination/Knowledge Utilization Base
Science Communication, March 1, 1991; 12(3): 266 - 288.
[Abstract]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Davis, G. R. Norman, A. Painvin, E. Lindsay, M. S. Ragbeer, and D. Rath
Attempting to Ensure Physician Competence
JAMA, April 18, 1990; 263(15): 2041 - 2042.
[Abstract] [PDF]