| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/016327878400700101 Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health ProfessionsThe State of the ArtUniversity of Southern California, School of Medicine In this article the author discusses three "levels" of the state of the art: the "ideal," for program evaluation; the " practical," with political limitations; and the "actual," for current practices. Starting with a review of the developmental stages of effectiveness variables (from attendance and "happiness" through professional performance and patient outcomes), the article updates a review by Lloyd and Abrahamson (1979) and then discusses current practices. Evaluation as a potential contamination factor leads into consideration of evaluation versus research. Finally a review of "lessons learned" over the last twenty years introduces a look ahead into exploitation of the state of the art.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


