This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Getzen, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Getzen, T. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Market and Evaluation Roles in Quality Assurance

Department of Health Administration School of Business Administration Temple University

Competitive markets and formal evaluations offer distinctly different mechanisms for controlling the quality of care based on patients'choices as consumers and applied scientific methods, respectively. As the difficulty of acquiring relevant information and its skewness towardproviders becomes greater, the needfor evaluations increases. Thus the complexities of medical care tend to limit the range of the market. Markets, however, provide information on value, accommodating differences in patient preferences and cost conditions not readily obtained withformal evaluations. Through incentives, markets integrate the evaluation and controlfunctions and may create greater efficiency and responsiveness. A variety of organizational structures for quality assurance are available, andformal evaluations are often incorporated within a market context. The policy task addressed here is to specify how, as conditions vary, greater reliance should be placed on market competition or on formal evaluations and external regulation.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 6, No. 3, 299-310 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878300600304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?