Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Cost of Quality Assurance in Medicine

Mark S. Thompson

R. Heather Palmer

Janet K. Rothrock

Rose Strain

Laura H. Brachman

Elizabeth A. Wright

Harvard School of Public Health

Cost analysis has beenfrequently neglected in program evaluations but is currently of high relevance in policy decisions on quality assurance in medicine. The Ambulatory Care Medical Audit Demonstration (A CMAD) Project implemented and evaluated a program of medical record-based quality assurance in eleven sites for nine medical topics. Total direct costs for the project were $1.22 million over five years; indirect costs, $694,000. A computerized data system enabled disaggregation of the cost data by person, timing, type of work, project phase, health topic, health center, and research or operational nature. Of the costs incurred, 79% were for operational reasons, with 21% incurred for research reasons. Costs per audited case were 31% higher in hospitals than in neighborhood health centers. Audit topics of low per-case costs tended to have automated case findings, straightforward and limited abstracting, little need to examine multiple visits, anda low proportion ofcase-foundpatients ineligible for audit.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 6, No. 3, 283-297 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878300600303
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?