Evaluation & the Health Professions

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanazaro, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanazaro, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 6, No. 2, 197-210 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878300600205

Determining Physicians' Performance

Continuing Medical Education and Other Interacting Variables

Paul J. Sanazaro

School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco

Participation informal continuing medical education (CME) is required by many organizations and state governments as the foremost means of assuring the quality of medical care. Analysis of the literature reveals that CME in all its forms is effective in improving competence, i.e., the ability to provide good care. However, that competence is not regularly reflected in physicians'habitual performance in the care of patients. A number offactors are known to narrow the gap between competence and performance, including clear specification of standards, individualfeedback on actual performance, and a professional environment conducive to the maintenance of high standards. In the presence of such factors, CMEcan improve physicians 'performance when directed to objectively identified def ciencies. However, public assurance of the quality of medical care can only be provided through certification that individual physicians'performance conforms to contemporary valid standards.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
E. C. Paluck, L. W. Green, C. J. Frankish, D. W. Fielding, and B. Haverkamp
Assessment of Communication Barriers in Community Pharmacies
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2003; 26(4): 380 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
N. Zwar, J. Wolk, J. Gordon, R. Sanson-Fisher, and L. Kehoe
Influencing antibiotic prescribing in general practice: a trial of prescriber feedback and management guidelines
Fam. Pract., October 1, 1999; 16(5): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
S. A. Mazzuca, F. Vinicor, R. M. Einterz, W. M. Tierney, J. A. Norton, and L. A. Kalasinski
Effects of the Clinical Environment on Physicians' Response to Postgraduate Medical Education
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1990; 27(3): 473 - 488.
[Abstract] [PDF]