Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hambleton, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hambleton, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Framework for Viewing the Process of Standard Setting

Ronald K. Hambleton

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Sally Powell

Smith College

The standard-setting literature isfilled with contributions in which issues associated with standards are discussed and various methods for setting standards are presented and reviewed. Almost no attention has been given to guidelines for helping standard-setting groups or committees address the issues and technical matters that arise in selecting and implementing a standard setting method and finally setting a standard (or standards). This article was prepared to describe sets of context-setting variables and technical matters associated with standard-setting to assist groups or committees desiring to set standards in a systematic way.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 6, No. 1, 3-24 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878300600101
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
B. Hodges, M. Hanson, N. McNaughton, and G. Regehr
Creating, Monitoring, and Improving a Psychiatry OSCE: A Guide for Faculty
Acad Psychiatry, September 1, 2002; 26(3): 134 - 161.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
R. K. Hambleton and H. J. Rogers
Technical Advances in Credentialing Examinations
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1986; 9(2): 205 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. A. Berk
A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced Tests
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1986; 56(1): 137 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]