This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, C. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Friedman, C. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Research and Evaluation Data Banks

A Comparative Study

Office of Medical Studies University of North Carolina

Computerized data banks for ongoing research and evaluation are becoming increasingly common in institutions of health professions education. An organization wishing to create such a system must choose among a virtually infinite set of alternatives for software design. Such choices are made in an uncertain environment since the exact nature of system use cannot be predicted. Tofacilitate software design, this article identifies numerous "rational" and "nonrational" factors affecting such decisions and a set of characteristics descriptive of the designs themselves. Using as examples four systems currently in operation in schools of medicine, the narrative examines ways in which software designs differ on these characteristics and some of the operating implications of these differences.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 5, No. 1, 17-27 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878200500102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?