Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sieber, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goulet, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sieber, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Assessment of Family Physicians' Performance Using Patient Charts

Interrater Reliability and Concordance With Chart-Stimulated Recall Interview

François Goulet

Collège des médecins du Québec, Montreal, goulet.cmq{at}sympatico.ca.

André Jacques

Collège des médecins du Québec, Montreal

Robert Gagnon

Collège des médecins du Québec, Montreal

Pierre Racette

Collège des médecins du Québec, Montreal

William Sieber

University of California, San Diego

Peer-assessment processes with chart review have been used for many years to assess the clinical performance of physicians. The Quebec medical licensing authority has been required by provincial law to assess the practicing Quebec physicians on a nonvoluntary basis. During the period from January 2001 to November 2004, 25 family physicians in active practice were randomly selected from a pool of about 300. For each physician, 25 to 40 patients' medical charts were randomly selected to evaluate the interrater reliability of peer-review assessment of medical charts and to compare ratings based on chart review with a chart-stimulated recall interview to those based on chart review alone. The concordance between chart review alone and that of chart review with chart-stimulated recall interview was 75% for chart keeping, 69% for clinical investigation, 81% for diagnostic accuracy, and 74% for treatment plan. Ratings based on chart review alone achieve moderate levels of reliability (Kappa = 0.44 to 0.56). It appears that some important information about quality of care is missed when only chart review is used.

Key Words: family physicians' clinical performance assessments • peer-assessment review • interrater reliability • chart-stimulated recall interview

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 30, No. 4, 376-392 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0163278707307924
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
D. Davis, G. Bordage, C. L. K. Moores, N. Bennett, S. S. Marinopoulos, P. E. Mazmanian, T. Dorman, and D. McCrory
The Science of Continuing Medical Education: Terms, Tools, and Gaps: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines
Chest, March 1, 2009; 135(3_suppl): 8S - 16S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]