Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talente, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Talente, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship Between Experience With Standardized Patient Examinations and Subsequent Standardized Patient Examination Performance

A Potential Problem With Standardized Patient Exam Validity

Gregg Talente

The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University

Steven A. Haist

University of Kentucky

John F. Wilson

University of Kentucky

Standardized patient (SP) exams are becoming an important part of testing clinical skills. The dynamics of this test format warrant exploration. This study is designed to measure the relationship between experience with SPs and performance on a SP examination. A general linear model is used to determine if a relationship exists and the pattern of that relationship as experience increases. There is a linear association between increased experience and better performance in technical domains. In interpersonal skill domains, there is a curvilinear association between experience and performance with improved performance with moderate levels of experience but not in the most experienced group. Different levels of experience with SPs are associated with differences in performance. The varied pattern of associations suggests a possible practice effect or test-taking behavior. Additional studies are needed to assess this potential effect on SP exam validity.

Key Words: standardized patients • medical education • testing • test-wiseness • practice effect

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 30, No. 1, 64-74 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0163278706297334


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
A. M. Brenner
Uses and Limitations of Simulated Patients in Psychiatric Education
Acad Psychiatry, March 1, 2009; 33(2): 112 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]