Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bierer, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bierer, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument Designed to Measure the Educational Quality of Graduate Training Programs

S. Beth Bierer

Andrew J. Fishleder

Elaine Dannefer

Nancy Farrow

Alan L. Hull

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

To assess the quality of residency education programs at an academic medical center for purposes of enhancing individual graduate medical education programs, we asked residents and fellows (N = 419) to evaluate their training programs using a Web-based questionnaire (response rate = 70%). Kruskal-Wallis tests, factor analysis, correlations, generalizability/decision studies, and mean plots were used to examine trainee responses and to assess the questionnaire’s measurement properties. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the instrument had a threefactor structure that correlated highly with overall program rating. Cronbach’s alpha exceeded .80 for all factors, and decision studies revealed that 13 to 23 raters were needed to obtain G-coefficients greater than .70. Mean plots showed that the instrument could discriminate within and among training programs at the item level and the factor level, which should help target improvements across graduate training programs within large institutions.

Key Words: program evaluation • graduate medical education • reliability

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 27, No. 4, 410-424 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0163278704270006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?