This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Straus, S. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Straus, S. E Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Blood Thinners Stroke Hazardous Substances DB WARFARIN Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Individualizing Treatment Decisions

The Likelihood of Being Helped or Harmed

University of Toronto

Clinical decision making cannot rely on evidence alone. Although significant advances have occurred in the development of high-quality evidence, similar efforts must be made to develop and evaluate tools that can be used at the bedside to individualize treatment decisions and to facilitate the incorporation of our patients’ unique values and circumstances into the decision-making process. These tools should express the helpful and harmful effects of treatment, and it must be possible to modify these statements using patients’ values. Finally, this process should be accomplished in real time in a busy clinical practice. In this article, the author outlines some of these decision support tools, describes an attempt to meet some of the challenges inherent in the goal of achieving effective shared decision making, and proposes a patient-centered measure of the likelihood of being helped and harmed by an intervention and discusses its derivation and an evaluation of its usefulness.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 25, No. 2, 210-224 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/016327870202500206


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Bassler, J. W Busse, P. J Karanicolas, and G. H Guyatt Evidence-based practice targets the individual patient. Part 1: how clinicians can use study results to determine optimal individual care Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2008; 11(4): 103 - 104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. McAlister MD MSc The "number needed to treat" turns 20 -- and continues to be used and misused Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 9, 2008; 179(6): 549 - 553. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bassler, J. W Busse, P. J Karanicolas, and G. H Guyatt Evidence-based medicine targets the individual patient, part 1: how clinicians can use study results to determine optimal individual care Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2008; 13(4): 101 - 102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Geddes Providing the best available evidence: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... THE ANTIDEPRESSANT TALE Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2006; 12(5): 327 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wen, R. Badgett, and J. Cornell Number needed to treat: A descriptor for weighing therapeutic options Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2005; 62(19): 2031 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Marx and H. C Bucher Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analysis: a word of caution Evid. Based Med., March 1, 2003; 8(2): 36 - 37. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Straus, S. R. Majumdar, and F. A. McAlister New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Clinical Applications JAMA, September 18, 2002; 288(11): 1396 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]