This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tickle-Degnen, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tickle-Degnen, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

From the General to the Specific

Using Meta-Analytic Reports in Clinical Decision Making

Boston University

The purpose of this article is to describe how health practitioners can interpret the results from published meta-analytic reports of intervention effectiveness and efficacy studies, and then communicate those results, in a manner that helps patients make critical clinical and life decisions. The problem of using research evidence in clinical decision making is one of moving from generalized findings about intervention effectiveness to a prediction for a specific patient. To move toward a reasonable prediction, practitioners need information from a meta-analytic report that enables them to identify and understand the distribution of outcome results that are most applicable to a specific patient. Relevancy, effectiveness, and interpretation forms of information are discussed in this article. The focus is on the interpretation of the effect size statistics d and r for understanding the variation in responses that the patient might experience with an intervention.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 24, No. 3, 308-326 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01632780122034939


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?