Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnette, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schuldt, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barnette, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schuldt, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Student Attitudes toward Same-Gender versus Mixed-Gender Partnering in Practicing Physical Examination Skills

J. Jackson Barnette

Clarence D. Kreiter

Sandra S. Schuldt

University of Iowa

Students were surveyed to assess perceptions with regard to the use of same-gender and mixed-gender partnering in practicing physical examinations. There was support for this arrangement, with students reporting that the practice provided an important learning experience with reasonable levels of comfort and no loss of thoroughness and rigor. Students did express some concerns. Females tended to have lower comfort levels, particularly when they were in the role of patient. Many of the concerns expressed could be addressed with procedural changes during the assignment of partners, and the benefits of continuing this practice seem to outweigh any negative aspects.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 23, No. 3, 360-370 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/01632780022034651


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?