Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Faculty Ratings as Part of a Competency-Based Evaluation Clinic Grading System

David W. Chambers

University of the Pacific–San Francisco

The traditional system for determining grades in dental school clinic courses has been counts of productivity and daily marks for degree of technical excellence. One dental school with a competency-based educational model has redesigned its evaluation system to include assessment of understanding as well as performance of procedures, diagnosis and judgment, and patient management. Competency tests were instituted in all disciplines to replace the required volume of work. A quarterly rating system was developed to replace daily grading. Results from one of the first administrations of the ratings are presented. They show excellent face validity and rater consistency in some cases. Gradients of generalizability are reported, demonstrating that the ratings satisfy the school’s standard for grade defensibility.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 22, No. 1, 86-106 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/01632789922034185
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. M. Hauser and D. M. Bowen
Primer on Preclinical Instruction and Evaluation
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2009; 73(3): 390 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
J. E.N. Albino, S. K. Young, L. M. Neumann, G. A. Kramer, S. C. Andrieu, L. Henson, B. Horn, and W. D. Hendricson
Assessing Dental Students' Competence: Best Practice Recommendations in the Performance Assessment Literature and Investigation of Current Practices in Predoctoral Dental Education
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2008; 72(12): 1405 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
J. E. Milani, H. H. Chi, and D. W. Chambers
Comments as Part of a Clinical Competency Rating System
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2007; 71(2): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
D. W. Chambers
Do Repeated Clinical Competency Ratings Stereotype Students?
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2004; 68(12): 1220 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]