Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taube, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taube, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Incorporation of Empirical Item Difficulty Data into the Angoff Standard-Setting Procedure

Kurt T. Taube

American Association, of State Social Work Boards

This study represents an attempt at incorporating empirical item difficulty data into the Angoff standard-setting procedure without affecting the subjective judgment of the raters. The Raschmodel ability level corresponding to minimal competence was estimated for each of 536 items on the American Association of State Social Work Boards (AASSWB) social work licensure examinations from their empirical calibrations and Angoff ratings. The mean of these estimatesforall items on a given examination was taken as the level of minimal competence for the entire examination. This procedure yielded raw passing scores that were 4 to 6 items lower (out of 150) and pass rates that were 7% to 15% higherthan those obtained using the "standard" Angoffprocedure.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 20, No. 4, 479-498 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879702000406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?