Evaluation & the Health Professions

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Driscoll, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 2, No. 4, 387-418 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/016327877900200401

Nurse Practitioner Effectiveness

A Review of Physician-Nurse Comparison Studies

Patricia A. Prescott

University of Colorado

Laura Driscoll

University of Colorado

This article discusses selected conceptual and methodological issues associated with studies evaluating nurse practitioner effectiveness by comparing nurse practitioner and physician practice. The particular areas covered include: the comparison criteria and the standards and the research methods used in these studies. Recommen dations for future studies include: (1) activities representing the full range of the nurse practitioner role should be included in any comprehensive evaluation of nurse practitioners; (2) explicit criteria with adequate sensitivity should form the basis of comparisons between nurse practitioners and physicians; (3) empirically established relationships between process and outcome variables should form the basis for estab lishing nonarbitrary performance standards whenever possible; (4) random sampling of nurse practitioners and physicians should be used when possible. When random sampling is not possible, providers should be selected using variables known to correlate with quality of care; (5) random assignment of patients to providers is strongly recommended, taking care to use clients new to both providers; (6) use of multiple data sources is recommended to decrease the current heavy reliance on audits; (7) conclusions should point out differential findings identifying those which favor physicians, those which favor nurse practi tioners, and those identifying no differences between providers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. P. Kassirer
What Role for Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care?
N. Engl. J. Med., January 20, 1994; 330(3): 204 - 205.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
B. N. Bibb
Comparing NursePractitioners and Physicians: A Simulation Study on Processes of Care
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1982; 5(1): 29 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]