Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pohlman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pohlmann, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pohlman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pohlmann, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Use of a Simulated MCAT to Predict Real MCAT Scores

Mary Pohlman

Medical Education Preparatory Program, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University

Mary W. Richardson

Medical Education Preparatory Program, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University

John T. Pohlmann

Department of Guidance and Educational Psychology, Southern Illinois University

A Mock MCA Twas developed and administered to 39 premedical students two weeks prior to the April 1977 administration of the New MCAT. Mock MCAT results were provided to these studentsfor each of the six areas of the actual MCA T. Twenty-seven examinees also took the real MCAT. Correlation coefficients between real and Mock MCA T scores were obtained and stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the extent to which the Mock MCA T could predict real MCA T scores. Correlations of .85, .76, .74, .81, .82, and .81 were obtained for biology, chemistry, physics, science problems, reading, and quantitative areas, respectively.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 2, No. 3, 357-364 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/016327877900200305
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?