Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soeken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soeken, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.-F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Realizing the Meta-Analytic Potential

A Survey of Experts

Karen L. Soeken

R. Barker Bausell

Yu-Fang Li

University of Maryland

A survey of 99 authors of meta-analyses conducted between 1988 and 1993 was undertaken to identify policies and products that might be helpful in the realization of the procedure 's ultimate potential Although a number of differences werefound between medical and social/nonmedically related health scientists, the greatest degree of overall enthusiasm for both groups was observedfor the need to educate journal editors and primary researchers regarding information that needs to be reported in an empirical study. The respondents were also in general agreement that a consensus should be developed and disseminated on minimum standards for published meta-analyses. A number of the other proposals were less popular, although an argument is made that some of these have actually come to fruition since the original survey was conducted.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 18, No. 3, 336-344 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879501800307
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?