This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yeation, W. H. Articles by Wortman, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yeation, W. H. Articles by Wortman, P. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Exploratory Research Synthesis

Methodological Considerations for Addressing Limitations in Data Quality

University of Michigan

John C. Langenbrunner

U.S. Office of Management and Budget

Joshua M. Smyth

Paul M. Wortman

State University of New York at Stony Brook

Exploratory meta-analysis or research synthesis has been advocated as a way of developing important hypotheses for further study. An exploratory research synthesis was conducted on the carotid endarterectomy (CE) literature to illustrate this method. The CE scientific literature is similar to that of many other new medical interventions because it contains numerous limitations to data quality. Exploratory research synthesis of such literature necessitates a number of methodological and statistical considerations to address these limitations, including the problems of missing data, appropriate unit of analysis, nonnormal distribution of outcomes, and lack of controlled studies. Strengths and limitations of the exploratory research synthesis approach are discussed within the context of public policy decisions for assessing medical technologies.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 18, No. 3, 283-303 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879501800304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?