Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Guidelines for using Standardized Outcome Measures Following Addictions Treatment

Kathryn Graham

Addiction Research Foundation

Increasingly, program managers are incorporating existing standardized tests as part of outcome evaluation. This article identifies guidelines for selecting and using standardized measuresfollowing addictions treatment. The principles identified in this context, however, are not only applicable to addictions treatment evaluation but also to the use of standardized measures in outcome evaluation of health programs generally. These guidelines cover eight basic criteria for selecting outcome measures: validity, sensitivity to measuring change, suitabilityfor type of clients in the program, acceptability, clinical usefulness, ease of administration, scoring, and low cost. The article also discusses uses of outcome data, comparison of monitoring client outcomes to other forms of evaluation, and some practical issues related to using standardized outcome measures, including selecting what to measure and interpreting results.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 17, No. 1, 43-59 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879401700103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?