Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gosseuink, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gosseuink, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Using Qualitative Methods to Evaluate Health Service Delivery in Three Rural Colorado Communities

Holly W. Halvorson

University of Colorado Cancer Center

Donna K. Pike

Rocky Mountain Center for Health Promotion and Education

Frank M. Reed

Maureen W. McClatchey

Carol A. Gosseuink

Amc Cancer Research Center

Qualitative and quantitative methods can be used simulaneously for hypothesis generation and testing. A pilot study was conducted in 1991 in three rural Colorado communities to carfy health service delivery problems related to canwer. The analysis focused on the perceptions of three types of respondents in each community related to whether cancer was a major problem, whether health services were adequate in their community and what perceived solutions could be implemented Respondents included community influentiaLs, health care providers, and cancer patients or family members. Semistructured phone interviews were used to collect perceptions of these community members. Transcripts from the three communities were combined, coded, and tallied. Several distinct themes emerged from the analysis. These included: cancer was a major problem; public and provider education was needed; community systems and support to identify and solve health problems were lacking; medical networking needed to be expanded; transportation was a problem for remote communities; inability to pay for services was a problem for rural communities. Most respondents identified the problems as relevant to other chronic and acute diseases as well as cancer This method identified the critical problems for the majority of the people without losing sight of the outlier responses.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 16, No. 4, 434-447 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879301600406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?