Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Process Evaluation of a System (Partners for Prevention) for Prevention-Oriented Primary Care

Holly W. Halvorson

Stuart J. Cohen

Amc Cancer Research Center

Karen L. Brekke

Copic Insurance Company

Maureen W. Mcclatchey

AMC Cancer Research Center

Max M. Cohen

Rose Medical Center

Process evaluation can identify program components that are related to success, that are generalizable to other settings, and that improve future applications of the program. The Partnersfor Prevention pilot project tested an office-based system aimed at increasing cancer prevention and screening in primary care offices and involving 17 physicians in private practice. Process evaluation techniques included monitoring systems, satisfaction surveys, and focus groups with the program participants. Each evaluation technique provided different information concerning strategies. The program was difficult to implement on busy days, the materials were useful but needed more flexibility, communication between patient and physician was facilitated, and the office coordinator was a crucial person. Program philosophy was acceptable, but materials needed refinement. The flow sheet and patient health check have been dramatically simplified and customized. New strategies are being tested in a randomized control trial.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 16, No. 1, 96-105 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879301600107
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?