This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carpinello, S. E. Articles by Jatulis, L. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carpinello, S. E. Articles by Jatulis, L. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Health Decision Makers' Perceptions of Program Evaluation

Relationship to Purpose and Information Needs

New York State Office of Mental Health

Dianna L. Newman

University atAlbany, State University of New York

Linnea L. Jatulis

Russell Sage College

This study investigates alternate reasons for conducting program evaluation in community health care settings and their relationships with information needs. One hundred thirtysix community health care decision makers were used in this survey. Results of a factor analysis indicated three major purposes for conducting program evaluation, listed in order of use: accreditation, true evaluation, and pseudoevaluation. A second analysis on need for information showed little differences in responses. Five factors were identified: descriptive information for validity/credibility, opinions, financial information, action information, and empirical information for validity! credibility. There was no relationship between thefive types of information needs and accreditation, suggesting that accreditation was a symbolic use of evaluation; however, information needs were predictors of true evaluation and pseudolquasi evaluation. Regression analyses indicated that descriptive information providing evidence of validity/credibility was predictive of the purpose of true evaluation whereas empirical and descriptive evidence of validity/credibility were predictors of quasi/pseudo evaluation. Information for decision makers acted as a suppressor variable on the latter.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 15, No. 4, 405-419 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879201500404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?