This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kremer, B. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kremer, B. K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Physician Recertification and Outcomes Assessment

American Board of Medical Specialties

Physician recertification poses a unique challenge to member boards of theAmerican Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) charged with the responsibility of credentialing physicians. The key issue that emerges in recertification programs is how to evaluate performance in practice. Although some test of knowledge may be appropriate, an evaluation of clinical performance has become essential in recertification programs. To meet this challenge, ABMS boards have adopted methods to evaluate performance in practice. However, regardless of the methods chosen, criteria are needed to serve as standards. This article considers the application of outcomes assessment in the definition of standards for recertification. When direct outcome assessment may not be possible, outcome-validated process measures may provide a suitable alternative.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 14, No. 2, 187-200 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879101400204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, A. J. Furlan, W. R. Selman, E. J. Russell, P. E. Stieg, M. N. Hadley, and for the NeuroVascular Coalition Writing Group Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: A Joint Statement from the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and the Society of Interventional Radiology Neurology, January 25, 2005; 64(2): 190 - 198. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, A. J. Furlan, W. R. Selman, E. J. Russell, P. E. Stieg, M. N. Hadley, and For the NeuroVascular Coalition Writing Group Training, Competency, and Credentialing Standards for Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography, Carotid Stenting, and Cerebrovascular Intervention: A Joint Statement from the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and Society of Interventional Radiology Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 26 - 34. [Full Text] [PDF]