This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Levinson, W. Articles by Skeff, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Levinson, W. Articles by Skeff, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Retrospective Versus Actual Pre-Course Self-Assessments

Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University

Geoffrey Gordon

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University

Kelley Skeff

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Stanford University School of Medicine

Self-assessments are frequently used to evaluate the effectiveness of medical education programs. The change in learners' self-ratings preto post-course is attributed to the educational intervention. However, participants may also change their understanding of the dimension being measured and hence, adjust their criteria for self-rating (response shift). This study was designed to compare a conventional prelpost course evaluation design with a retrospective pre/post method used to minimize the effect of the response shift. Participants attending a course in 1987 or 1988 designed to improve interviewing and teaching skills completed a faculty self-rating form (a) one month before the course; (b) after the course, assessing their pre-course skill level (retrospective pre-course); and (c) after the course, assessing their present skill level (post-course). Retrospective pre-course ratings were significantly lower than actual precourse ratings in two out of four factors empirically derived from the assessment instrument in 1987 and three of four in 1988. Greater differences preto post-course were found using the retrospective as opposed to the actual pre-course self-ratings. Our findings indicate that the collection of retrospective pre-course and post-course self-ratings at a single point in time demonstrates greater differences than the conventional pre/post evaluation method. Use of the retrospective precourse method is efficient and may be a more accurate evaluation method than the conventional prelpost evaluation.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 13, No. 4, 445-452 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879001300406


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Rubin, L. O. Rustveld, R. J. Weyant, and J. M. Close Exploring Dental Students' Perceptions of Cultural Competence and Social Responsibility J Dent Educ., October 1, 2008; 72(10): 1114 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Selecky, C. A. H. Eliasson, R. I. Hall, R. F. Schneider, B. Varkey, ACCP Ethics Committee, and D. R. McCaffree Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: American College of Chest Physicians Position Statement Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3599 - 3610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J Brown, M. Gottschalk, P. H Van Ness, R. H Fortinsky, and M. E Tinetti Changes in Physical Therapy Providers' Use of Fall Prevention Strategies Following a Multicomponent Behavioral Change Intervention Physical Therapy, May 1, 2005; 85(5): 394 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Wartman, P. S. O'Sullivan, and M. G. Cyr Ambulatory-based Residency Education: Improving the Congruence of Teaching, Learning, and Patient Care Ann Intern Med, June 15, 1992; 116(12_Part_2): 1071 - 1075. [Abstract] [PDF]