This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rowland-Morin, P. A. Articles by Carroll, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rowland-Morin, P. A. Articles by Carroll, J. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service Family Issues Talking With Your Doctor Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Verbal Communication Skills and Patient Satisfaction

A Study of Doctor-Patient Interviews

University of Rhode Island

J. Gregory Carroll

Miles, Inc., West Haven, CT

This research attempted to quantify specific behaviors in the physician's initial interviewing style and relate them to patients' perception of satisfaction. Five physicians were tape recorded during their initial interviews with 52 adult patients. The patients were asked to complete the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale, a 29-item instrument with a 7-point response scale. These interviews were transcribed, timed, coded, and analyzed with the use of the Computerized Language Analysis System. Selected variables of the language dimensions were entered as the predictor variables in a multiple regression, along with satisfaction scores as the dependent variables. Twenty-seven percent of the variance (p <.01) in the satisfaction scores of initial interviews were explained by three aspects of a physician's language style: (a) use of silence or reaction time latency between speakers in an interview, (b) whether there was language reciprocity as determined through the reciprocal use of wordlists, and (c) the reflective use of interruptions within an interview. Considering the complexity of human communication, the fact that three variables were identified, which accounted for 27% of the variance in patients 'satisfaction, is considered a substantial finding.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 13, No. 2, 168-185 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879001300202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Simon, L. A. Siminoff, E. D. Kodish, and C. Burant Comparison of the Informed Consent Process for Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric and Adult Oncology J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 22(13): 2708 - 2717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J Friedrichsen, P. M Strang, and M. E Carlsson Cancer patients' interpretations of verbal expressions when given information about ending cancer treatment Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2002; 16(4): 323 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Brown, M. Boles, J. P. Mullooly, and W. Levinson Effect of Clinician Communication Skills Training on Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Ann Intern Med, December 7, 1999; 131(11): 822 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shapiro Correlates of family-oriented physician communications Fam. Pract., June 1, 1999; 16(3): 294 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Strombeck and J. A. Levy Educational Strategies and Interventions Targeting Adults Age 50 and Older for HIV/AIDS Prevention Research on Aging, November 1, 1998; 20(6): 912 - 936. [Abstract]

				S. C. RATZAN Health Communication as Negotiation: The Healthy America Act American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 1994; 38(2): 224 - 247. [Abstract]