Evaluation & the Health Professions

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stillman, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stillman, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 13, No. 1, 79-103 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/016327879001300105

Use of Standardized Patients for Teaching And Assessing Clinical Skills

David B. Swanson

National Board of Medical Examiners

Paula L. Stillman

University of Massachusetts, Medical School

Among other significant findings, Elstein, Shulman, & Sprafka (1978) demonstrated that diagnostic expertise is content-specific, tending to be limited to clinical problems with which a physician has had substantial experience. They recommended use of a highly structured, problem-oriented curriculum in which students systematically learn about common problems, so that medical schools could guarantee students' competence to diagnose and treat those problems. Clinical training at most medical schools is far less organized than this: available clinical facilities dictate the patient problems with which students becomefamiliar. In order to increase control over the training environment and the learning outcomes that result, a growing number of schools now use standardized patients (SPs) to teach and test key clinical skills. SPs are non-physicians trained to accurately and consistently portray patients in simulated clinical situations. Students interact with SPs as though they are interviewing, examining, or counseling real patients. This paper discusses the variety of methods in which schools supplement traditional instruction with SP-basedprograms and reviews recent studies of the psychometric characteristics of SP-based tests.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
B. D. Hodges
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Three Decades of Development
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2006; 33(4): 571 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. T. Fitzgerald, F. M. Wolf, W. K. Davis, M. L. Barclay, M. E. Bozynski, K. R. Chamberlain, S. G. Clyman, T. C. Shope, J. O. Woolliscrofi, and G. B. Zelenock
A Preliminary Study of the Impact of Case Specificity on Computer-Based Assessment of Medical Student Clinical Performance
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1994; 17(3): 307 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]