This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sobal, J. Articles by Ferentz, K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sobal, J. Articles by Ferentz, K. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparing Physicians' Responses to the First and Second Mailings of a Questionnaire

Cornell University

Kevin Scoff Ferentz

University of Maryland

Surveys are an important data collection method in evaluation research. Low response rates often occur, with follow-ups used to increase responses. However, surveys of homogeneous groups, such as physicians, about topics of concern to them may not require high response rates. We examined physician responses to a first and second mailing of a family practice questionnaire sent to a national sample of 308 recent residency graduates, 383 residency directors, and 319 residents. Among graduates, the first mailing produced a 63% response and the second another 17%; among directors, thefirstproduced 79% and the second another 10%; and among residents, the first gave 55% and the second another 21%. No differences between the two mailings existed by demographic variables, substantive questions ornonresponse to questions, with two exceptions. The absence of differences in physicians who responded to the follow-up questionnaire suggests that remailings to obtain higher response rates may be unnecessary in some surveys.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 12, No. 3, 329-339 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878901200307


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Szeinbach, E. Seoane-Vazquez, A. Parekh, and M. Herderick Dispensing errors in community pharmacy: perceived influence of sociotechnical factors Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 203 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Schoenman, M. L. Berk, J. J. Feldman, and A. Singer Impact Of Differential Response Rates On The Quality Of Data Collected In The CTS Physician Survey Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2003; 26(1): 23 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Parsons, R. B. Warnecke, R. F. Czaja, J. Barnsley, and A. Kaluzny Factors Associated With Response Rates in a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians Eval Rev, December 1, 1994; 18(6): 756 - 766. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Berk, W. S. Edwards, and N. L. Gay The Use of a Prepaid Incentive to Convert Nonresponders on a Survey of Physicians Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1993; 16(2): 239 - 245. [PDF]