Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation & the Health Professions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Haley, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Haley, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Biochemical and Interview Measures of the Exposure of Infants to Environmental Tobacco Smoke

Karl E. Bauman

Victor J. Strecher

School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Robert A. Greenberg

School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Nancy J. Haley

American Health Foundation

This study of 37 infants found substantial agreement among a biochemical indicator of infant passive smoking, an interview measure of the tobacco smoke environment of the infant, and active smoking in the household When any of the three measures were compared, both measures were positive for 75% to 82% of the subjects and negative for 88% to 92%. The correlations among the variables considered as continuous measures ranged from .64 to .74. These correlations are strong enough to suggest that both measures reflect exposure but too weak to assume that one measure can serve as a ready substitute for the other The agreement among continuous measures was due to their ability to distinguish between exposed and nonexposed infants, rather than to their continuous properties.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 12, No. 2, 179-191 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878901200204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?