This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cavanaugh, S. H. Articles by Loadman, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cavanaugh, S. H. Articles by Loadman, W. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Dimensionality of Measures Derived from a Nationally Standardized Written Clinical Simulation Examination

NBRC Management Services, Inc. Shawnee Mission, Kansas

William E. Loadman

College of Education Ohio State University

The literature reflects substantial controversy regarding the dimensionality of various scores derived from a variety of patient management problem tests. The purposes of this study were to determine (1) the dimensionality of 20 problem score measures derived from a nationally standardized written clinical simulation examination and (2) the stability and generalizability of the resulting factor structure across both examinee groups and test forms. Test score data from two independent national samples that completed the same test form were obtained (Ni = 2,812; N2 = 312); a third independent national sample completed a different test form (N3 = 2,546). Each of the three 20 x 20 intercorrelations was subjected to confirmatory factor analysis in an attempt to validate a two-dimensional solution, but such a solution could not be substantiated. Subsequent exploratory factor analyses yielded consistent one-factor solutions for each of the three data sets, demonstrating generalizability and stability of this one-factor structure across both different groups of examinees and different tests forms. This study clearly demonstrated that for the examination under study, there is only one underlying dimension rather than two as suggested in the literature and reflected in the existing test scoring practice.

Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 11, No. 3, 333-357 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/016327878801100304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. R. Yarnold, S. D. Nightingale, R. H. Curry, and G. J. Martin Psychological Androgyny and Preference for Intubation in a Nypothetical Case of End-stage Lung Disease Med Decis Making, August 1, 1990; 10(3): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]